Before the Japanese could comprehend what had happened, the US made another massive attack on Nagasaki. Enola Gay will forever be remembered in that event. It was a B bomber that was used by the US to carry out the horrible massacre. There were twelve men on board who ensured that the mission run smoothly.
The aircraft had been modified in order to accommodate such a huge atomic bombing. It had stronger engines and newly modified propellers. It was escorted by two bombers which had numerous measuring devices. Stimson, the secretary of War in the US by that time had chosen Kyoto. However, the committee argued that it was important to choose the cities which had been untouched during the war.
The administration of the United States decided that Hiroshima and Negasaki were the best target cities. The reasons for launching the attacks were Japan to surrender to America as fast as possible in order to reduce the US casualties and to develop the US dominance globally.
The entire city was destroyed within few minutes. Also, the demonstration may not have shown any of the power of the bomb: Even if the bomb did work, the United States would have to tell the Japanese where to look ahead of time, and the Japanese might have put prisoners of war or other people in the target area. Lastly, I agree with the statement is because the bombings claimed far less lives than would have been taken during an invasion.
Between the two cities, there was estimated to have been approximately , deaths as a result of the bombings. President Truman estimated that as many as one million American soldiers would have died in an invasion of Japan, as would most of the two million Japanese soldiers stationed in the home islands, as well as many civilians. President Truman intended the atomic bomb to be a way to end the war at a minimum cost of American and Japanese lives.
By way of comparison, the attack on the naval base at Pearl Harbour killed people and wounded The civilian casualties at Pearl Harbour were 68 dead and 35 wounded 1. It is argued that the attacks on Pearl Harbour on 7 December provide justification for dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as this is the easiest argument to dispose of.
There is an assertion: If you get into an argument with somebody at a bar because you spilled his beer and refused to buy him another one, you are in the wrong, and he has every right to tell everyone in the bar what a prick you are. This argument might be valid if there were a certain degree of rough proportionality between the attack providing justification and the response. Here, however, there is no proportionality. The disproportionality becomes even more obvious when we note that Beyond the obvious disproportionality, this argument is inapposite in another respect.
Moreover, under the law, even self-defence must be proportionate to the danger presented by the assailant and not exceed the amount of force reasonably necessary to ward off the danger. I feel that dropping the atomic bomb is necessary. During the Japanese occupation in Asian, more than millions civilians were killed. In the Nanking Massacre alone, ,—, people were killed and around , casualties. Fuiji is used to taking care of patients and making sure that a person is close to healthy, if not one hundred percent healthy.
As a doctor, he also knows how to comfort and empathize for those who are injured. Fuiji was, by nature, a simple and stress-free person, which translated into his reactions once the initial hits of the Hiroshima bombs ended. After finding out that Dr. Fuiji had no radiation symptoms like the other patients, the reader learns of what his advice is to those who were affected and his own lifestyle. This statement proves how different Dr. Fuiji proved to be compared to the other victims of this attack.
He did not show much despair, regret, or anger at the Americans shortly after the bomb and even seemed to have done better and built a better second life from the result of these terrible attacks. Although it is undeniable that Dr.
Fuiji still showed empathy for those who were severely affected with radiation or other diseases, he certainly did not take too much out of himself to be worried about others.
Hiroshima Essay - The most significant theme in John Hersey’s book “Hiroshima” are the long- term effects of war, confusion about what happened, long term mental and physical scars, short term mental and physical scars, and people being killed.
- In his essay "Hiroshima," John Berger examines the bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, As he flips through the pages of the book Unforgettable Fire, he begins to relay his own views on the dropping of the A-bomb. Berger suggests his belief that it was an act of terrorism on the Japanese.
Atomic Bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki An atomic bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is a historical event that will forever remain a mystery to the Japanese people. August 6th, is the day that the United States of America used a colossal atomic bombing attack against Japan in Hiroshima. Hiroshima Essay Words | 3 Pages. The book Hiroshima, written by John Hersey, is a great book to read. The book gives a great portrayal of the struggles that the people of Hiroshima went through after the bombing by the Americans during World War II.
The purpose of this research paper is to explore the events of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, examine the causes, interpretations and consequences of the bombings. History of Hiroshima. The early history of Hiroshima dates back to the 6th century, when some of the first Shinto Shrines were erected on Hiroshima bay (Cameron, ). In the essay, Hiroshima by John Berger, the author correctly argues that the bombings were terroristic acts that are fundamentally evil; however, he is incorrect that they are unjustifiable. To diagnose whether the bombings were acts of terrorism, one must be able to understand the definition and criteria of one such act.